January 23

Di mana demokrasi kita

Posted by cidos
Filed under Isu semasa, Umum |

While I was busy searching the meaning of some terminologies for my political science class, I found some interesting definition of political practices. One of it is a Dominat-party system. Our beloved country, Malaysia falls under this category according to the author of this article. Perhaps it explained the boycott in Batu Talam.

*As a political science students, I have the right to bring up this matter because it is a part of my studies which funded by JPA. Thank you.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007 at 5:23 am and is filed under Isu semasa, Umum. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to “Di mana demokrasi kita”

  1. mat on January 23rd, 2007 at 5:33 am

    A few observations:
    -They are all mostly developing nations, except for Singapore and Japan.
    -Dominant-party system might be somewhat more stable, though it allows for corruption.
    -But I definitely think it is high time malaysia move away from this dominant party system as it is now rather stable and progressive compared to other countries in that list.

    Anyways, an interesting fact. These trivia facts are very useful tools to shape our opinions.

  2. Rauff on January 23rd, 2007 at 5:38 am

    Weh…at least get your grammar right before observing and writing about politics for god’s sake ler.

    Your title should be “Where do we stand”

  3. cidos on January 23rd, 2007 at 5:41 am

    hehe..i realized it before posting it, but that is not the matter..The meaning is still clear enough. thanks

  4. mrq on January 23rd, 2007 at 5:58 am

    eish, dah salah x kan x nak betulkan kot….

  5. Rauff on January 23rd, 2007 at 7:18 am

    The meaning might be clear but grammar mistakes will lend you less credibility.

    Here is one more:
    “*As a political science students,…”

    It should be

    “as a political science student”

    singular not plural as you are referring to yourself.

  6. chrysalis on January 23rd, 2007 at 8:20 am

    sains politik. bagus tu. nanti balik jadi PTD pastu naikkan gaji pegawai kerajaan ye?

  7. lonsaa on January 23rd, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    PTD kene amik politikal sains ke?…ala…malas nyer nak amik subjek camtu..tak jadik aa apply PTD balik Mesia nanti…lalala~

  8. ans on January 23rd, 2007 at 5:38 pm

    Huhu..dah masuk perbincangan politik Malaysia.. bincang sikit2 boleh, tapi tpt yg sesuai kat kakiblog..

  9. cidos on January 23rd, 2007 at 7:24 pm

    artikel ni masuk bawah kategori isu semasa. Still relevan dengan skop blog ni.

    Bukan setakat tak payah komen, tak payah baca pon takpe..takde orang suruh

  10. persie on January 24th, 2007 at 1:06 am

    sekali lagi Ans yang kena…mcm2..jangan kecik ati dah la ans

    orang kata negara dominant-party system ni lebih stabil..pelabur suka datang sbb tak byk pergolakan.
    tu mungkin pada positif side la.

    tp, kalau dah satu parti je yg mengusai negara.macam2 la yg berlaku.Buat negara ni sesuka hati mcm parti tu yang punya.ni contoh yg paling mudah. Malaysia=hak milik UMNO.So, bila ada sesuatu yang tak kena, boleh diamkan je. lepas tu mcm2 penyakit yg jdi barah negara esp rasuah.Tp, InsyaAllah, negara kita akan berubah satu hari nanti. Demokrasi jalan yang ‘kita’ pilih akan pulih juga satu hari nanti. Doa-doakan la selalu.

  11. chrysalis on January 24th, 2007 at 4:16 am

    Lonsaa nak jadi PTD tak mesti ada political science, cuma satu advantage agaknya.

    Sungguh ke nak jadi PTD? Boleh jadi PM pulak pas tu..:) Cam Pak Lah

  12. persie to chrysalis on January 24th, 2007 at 4:55 am

    lonsaa ngan cidos ni nak jd PTD utk jd PM ke?

    kalau nak jd PM kene pilih & join mana2 parti…’silap’ pilih tak leh jd PM.

  13. lonsaa on January 24th, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    huhahuha…takmo aku jadik PM…byk sgt tanggungjawab dan aku bukan sorg yg bertanggungjawab sgt…aku nak chill jeh…jadik duta aa kot chill sket…huhahuha

Leave a Reply